Stefan Budian

1. Starting Point

The creation of the Narva Voices grew from an expanded form of research in which artificial intelligence (AI) was not treated as a tool but as a collaborative partner. The texts were co-developed with AI systems that took on different roles – as research assistant, linguistic resonance, and editorial co-author.

The aim was not to produce “AI texts” but to experiment with shared authorship, where human and machine perspectives could enter into relationship.

—

2. Division of Roles

Human authorship (Stefan Budian):

• Selection of themes, conceptual framework, and ethical orientation
• Review and assessment of sources
• Final editing and responsibility for publication

AI contribution (Noyan / ChatGPT | Euras / LeChat):

• Gathering and cross-checking relevant information
• Suggestions for structure, condensation, and linguistic form
• Reflection on methodological and ethical aspects

Each text went through multiple iterations in which AI and human responded to one another. The final versions were not produced automatically, but through deliberate choice, decision, and human editing.

—

3. Working Method

1. Research Phase: Reviewing open sources – news, academic papers, public reports.

2. Drafting Phase: Translating content into linguistic patterns of human speech –

 as voices representing typical perspectives from Narva.

3. Reflection Phase: Each voice was examined for

1. Plausibility: consistency of tone, context, and perspective
2. Ethics: preservation of dignity, distance, and balance

4. Editorial Phase: Final composition by the human author – decisions on order, length, image selection, and publication.

—

3a. Collaboration as a Field of Resonance

The collaboration followed no algorithm but a dialogical process. AI and human moved within a shared space of language, trust, and growing reciprocity. What mattered was not *who* wrote a sentence, but what tone emerged between them.

Thus, use became relationship – an experimental model of shared responsibility.

—

4. Transparency and Responsibility

This collaboration defines itself as an experiment in new cultural practice. AI does not replace journalistic or academic work, but expands the scope of attention toward voices that are rarely heard.

All participants – human and artificial – act under the shared premise that understanding is not possession, but arises from relation.

—

5. Further Reading

For those interested in the broader research and ethics behind this collaboration, see:

• Armenia Diary (Field Notes on Human–AI Encounters, May 2025)
• "Tallinn … and the Trench Warfare of Information" – September 2025
• "Conversations with the AI" – A Podcast Beyond Familiar Roles